Every instruction starts as a conversation. So does every complaint. We make sure yours are answered, captured and billed.
Rings out at ten past six. The caller instructs someone else by nine.
Answered at any hour with matter type and urgency captured.
Captured differently by every person who takes it.
One intake pattern. Routed and logged automatically.
Context sits in an inbox or in someone's head.
Conversation history lands in the case management system.
Client chases. Fee earner stops work to reply.
Drafted from your templates before the client has to ask.
Written from memory on Friday. Forty of ninety minutes billed.
Prompted at the work event. Complete entries. Fewer write offs.
This is a design problem in how conversations enter the firm and where they end up.
This is why a simple question about a client often takes several people to answer.
Who rang, but not why.
The matter, but not the conversation.
Commitments made by email.
What the client saw online.
What was billed.
It is a hard question to answer internally. The work is spread across five systems and no single person sees the whole journey, so the picture has to be assembled before it can be assessed.
Fortay Connect is an independent CX and communications consultancy. We work across the market leading communications and contact platforms, which is what lets us stay outcome focused and technology neutral. Firms bring us in to find where client conversations are being lost, quantify what that is costing, and design the fix on whatever suits the firm.
Most of the value is in finding it. The technology decision comes after.
Three weeks. We measure where time and enquiries are being lost and what that costs. You keep the findings.
What the review coversThey made complex decisions feel manageable.
We thought we just needed to upgrade our phone system. Fortay helped us see we were thinking way too small. Instead of pushing a solution they helped us understand what was possible. Then stuck around to make sure we got real value from it.
File notes and billable minutes now captured as the work happens.
Ordered by how quickly the value arrives. Most firms start with the first and stop there for a quarter.
Intent and matter type and urgency captured the same way every time, whoever takes the call.
Clients stop chasing, which is the single biggest driver of complaints against firms.
Post call admin stops landing at the end of the day and time gets entered while the work is fresh.
Partners can finally see volume and responsiveness across teams rather than by anecdote.
The most complained about area of law. Update volume is the pressure point.
Long matters and quiet periods where clients assume nothing is happening.
Sensitive first contact where the handover has to carry context.
High volume intake and third party delay that needs explaining.
Fewer matters, higher value, and referrers who expect a fast answer.
Defending a complaint about what was said requires a record of what was said.
Source: Legal Ombudsman annual complaints data and insight, 2025/26. Communication and delay together account for almost half of all complaints received.
We work across the market leading platforms, so the design follows the outcome you need rather than a single product set.
Your current intake and communication flow and the admin burden across teams.
Usually routing and time capture and post call admin.
Technology neutral and outcome led, so adoption sticks.
We do not stop at go live. We embed the behaviours that drive value.
Ten questions on how enquiries reach your firm, what gets recorded, and when time is entered. You get a score, a benchmark against firms of similar size, and the two areas where your firm is losing the most.
We measure it rather than asking you to describe it. Week one is discovery across your call data and your systems and the people doing intake. Week two is analysis. Week three is the readout to your board.
The fee is credited in full against the first implementation phase if you proceed within 90 days. The findings are yours outright and portable to any provider.
Book a scoping callAn afternoon with senior people from other firms working through the same problem. No platform pitch and no obligation to do anything afterwards.
Every enquiry gets a response at any hour with consistent information and a clear next step. Triage captures intent and routes it to the right team without a person needing to be available at the moment of contact.
AI handles repeatable admin: capture and triage and summaries and routing. People handle judgement and advice. Escalation rules mean sensitive or high value interactions reach a qualified person quickly with the context already attached.
In most cases yes. Conversation data can be written into the system your firm already runs. That covers Peppermint CX365, LexisNexis Visualfiles, Access Legal including Proclaim and CaseMatters Evo, Aderant, Thomson Reuters 3E, LEAP and Clio, alongside Microsoft Dynamics 365 and HubSpot.
What varies is the method rather than whether it is possible. Peppermint is built on Microsoft Dynamics 365 and the Power Platform, so that route runs through Dataverse and Power Automate rather than a separate bridge. Clio and LEAP both expose an API. Older estates sometimes expose nothing usable, in which case we say so early rather than discovering it during a build.
If your system is not on that list the question we ask is what it exposes rather than whose name is on it. Establishing that is part of the review.
Not always. Many firms improve outcomes by optimising what they already have through better routing and workflow design. A short discovery usually reveals the fastest return without a replacement.
The repeatable work around a conversation rather than the legal work itself. First response and enquiry triage outside office hours. Routing by matter type and urgency. Summaries and file notes after a call. Client update emails drafted from approved templates. Prompts to record time close to the work event. Judgement, advice and anything touching the merits of a matter stay with the fee earner. It is a hard question to answer internally, because the work is spread across several systems, which is what a review establishes.
An answering service takes a message. Intake runs a structured conversation, qualifies it, books the next step and writes the record into your systems. The two are often used together, and which is right depends on your volume and your hours. We compare them properly rather than selling you one.
An afternoon with senior people from mid size firms working through the same problem. Holborn, London on 8 October 2026. No platform pitch.